Categories
Community

Red-Team Thinking for Developers: Building More Secure Apps

Most developers don’t get into programming because they want to think like hackers. But in today’s digital world, knowing how attackers think can be one of your best tools for writing secure code. If you’re building anything that connects to the internet—whether it’s a mobile app, web platform, or cloud-based service—security isn’t just a nice-to-have. It’s a necessity.

One of the most effective ways to stay ahead of potential threats is to borrow a page from the security playbook: red-team thinking. Traditionally used by cybersecurity pros, this mindset helps you spot weaknesses before bad actors do, and it’s something every developer can learn to apply.

{{ advertisement }}

What Is Red-Team Thinking?

Red-team thinking is a way of approaching problems with an attacker’s mindset. Instead of assuming everything will work as expected, you actively try to break things—to poke holes, exploit gaps, and uncover what could go wrong.

In cybersecurity, red teams are groups that simulate real-world attacks to test how well systems hold up under pressure. These teams are tasked with thinking creatively and strategically, finding the paths a malicious actor might take to bypass defenses or access sensitive data. Their goal isn’t to disrupt or destroy, but to help build stronger, more resilient systems by exposing weak spots.

For developers, adopting red-team thinking means incorporating these ideas early in the development process. It’s not about becoming a hacker, it’s about being aware of how attackers operate so you can write code that’s ready for them.

Why Developers Should Think Like Attackers

Security is often treated as a final step—something you worry about after the product works. But that’s like checking the locks after a burglar has already come through the window.

By thinking about security from the beginning, developers can prevent entire classes of vulnerabilities from ever making it into production. 

According to the Verizon 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report, 53% of breaches involved exploiting vulnerabilities in applications and systems. Many of these were caused by preventable issues like poor input validation, misconfigured access controls, or exposed APIs.

When you apply red-team thinking, you start asking questions like:

  • What could someone do with this endpoint if they had bad intentions?
  • Can this input be manipulated to run unexpected code?
  • If someone gains access to one part of the system, how far could they get?

These are the kinds of questions attackers are asking. Developers should ask them too.

How to Start Using Red-Team Thinking in Development

1. Build Security Into Your Design Process

Before you write a single line of code, take time to map out potential threats. One popular approach is threat modeling, which involves thinking through how your application might be attacked. Microsoft’s STRIDE model is a good starting point, covering common threat categories like spoofing, tampering, and elevation of privilege.

2. Break Your Own Code (Before Someone Else Does)

Don’t just test for whether your app works. Instead, test how it breaks. Try intentionally inputting unexpected values, changing parameters in URLs, or bypassing client-side validation. Use open-source tools like OWASP ZAP or Burp Suite Community Edition to scan for common vulnerabilities like cross-site scripting (XSS), SQL injection, or insecure headers.

You can even set up basic “red team exercises” with your team by assigning someone the role of attacker and having them try to bypass login flows, tamper with requests, or access restricted resources.

3. Follow the OWASP Top 10

If you do nothing else, get familiar with the OWASP Top 10, a list of the most critical security risks for web applications. It covers everything from broken access control to software and data integrity failures, and it’s regularly updated based on real-world data.

For each item on the list, ask yourself: Is my app vulnerable to this? If so, how can I fix it?

4. Think in Scenarios, Not Just Code

A big part of red-team thinking is looking beyond individual functions or components. It’s about how things connect—and how an attacker could use those connections to their advantage.

For example, a file upload feature might validate file type and size, but what happens if an attacker uploads a seemingly safe file that later executes a script on the server? Or imagine a forgotten admin endpoint left accessible after testing—how could someone find and exploit that?

Think in stories. Imagine what someone with bad intentions might do, step by step.

Making Security a Team Habit

Red-team thinking is most effective when it becomes part of your team culture. Encourage regular code reviews with a security focus. Run occasional internal “attack days” to test new features. Share security news or breach reports in Slack to stay aware of emerging threats.

The earlier you integrate this mindset, the less painful (and expensive) it will be to fix problems later. According to the IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report 2023, the average cost of a data breach was $4.45 million. That number alone makes a compelling case for building secure software from the start.

You don’t need to become a full-time security expert to protect your apps. But learning to think like someone who’s trying to break in? That’s a game-changer.

Red-team thinking empowers developers to stay ahead of threats, reduce risk, and build software that doesn’t just work—it withstands attack. By putting yourself in the attacker’s shoes, asking the tough questions early, and embracing a mindset of healthy paranoia, you’re doing more than writing code. You’re defending your users, your team, and your business.

And that’s something every developer can be proud of.

Categories
Business Tips

The Costs of App Security

The security features of an app are often ignored in the rush to get a new product to market. We naturally tend to focus more on what an app should do, rather than what it shouldn’t. Making sure that an app doesn’t have security issues is a difficult and potentially expensive process. Lately there is evidence that developers are trying at least to face app security costs issues. A recent post from our partners in DZone shows exactly this.

There are no automated tests to ensure user data hasn’t been left vulnerable. This goes for unencrypted passwords as well. Typically this requires a manual audit of the code and some form of penetration testing, with a skilled developer attempting to compromise the app. However, the costs of implementing security features and adding security testing to your development process are much smaller than the potential costs of a major security breach.

Problems with payments

For some types of app the consequences of this are more obvious. There are even standards in place to try to ensure a minimum level of security. For instance, any application which handles payment card details needs to process that data securely as specified by the Payment Cards Industry. However, PCI standards compliance is only audited for large merchants. Smaller merchants self-certify compliance.

If an app or service for a small merchant was compromised, resulting in abuse of payment card data, then any non-compliance discovered could result in significant fines or even liability for any fraudulent payments. Merchants who add interfaces to their existing payments infrastructure to support mobile apps need to be particularly careful. New attacks can be made possible when the payment authorisation occurs on a native mobile client, rather than a website.

Even for apps selling digital goods via in-app purchase there are still payment security issues to consider. Of course stakes are nowhere near as large. However, attackers can still impersonate the official store provider servers and simulate in-app purchases without any genuine payment.

Apple’s system was compromised in this way last summer. Another hack was reported for payments on Google Play just before Christmas. There is no link to this because, although it was only for rooted devices, we’re not aware of a fix in place yet. (Indeed it may even be a scam to get users to install malware).

Losing data can cost you even more

For enterprise app developers, being associated with a major security breach could mean the end of your business.

A harmful loss of data for a client could send valuable market data go to the competition, or even key employees. You would lose trust (and business)! If the breach is sufficiently public, you could lose the trust of all potential future clients as well.

The larger a company the more vital it is that they implement good security practices.

For consumer apps, leaking user data to attackers has direct costs. Firstly, in terms of service downtime whilst fixing security holes (usually in a hurry with the aid of expensive experts), notifying those affected and possible compensation. Secondly, there are serious indirect costs in terms of lost trust and users. Again here, the larger the user base, the more attractive the app is to attackers and the more serious any breach.

Invest in app security appropriately

Investments in security need to be proportional to the risks. How many users are involved and the value of data stored should determine the level of effort required to ensure that data is safe.

Not knowing about the security implications of your application is somewhat like driving without insurance.

Everything is fine until the unthinkable happens. Then it’s likely that lots of innocent people suffer and you get into a lot of trouble.

The technical details of app security are beyond the scope of this post. However, we have prepared a list of top 10 vulnerabilities and how to avoid them. Read on if your app deals with any user data or payments.